Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

The Simpsons Movie- review

October 8th 2008 00:58
Review- The Simpsons Movie

After sitting through the long-awaited cinematic debut of America’s favourite yellow animated family (the programme has only been astonishingly running non-stop for the past 20 years, accumulatively producing over 400 episodes) the other night, my thoughts are much the same as Homer’s. ‘Why pay to see something at the cinema when you can watch it at home for free?’ , he opines at the opening credits. Indeed.

Why on earth did they not make this film in 1997, at the height of Simpsonmania (for lack of a better term)? Or in 1990? My issue with the film is not that it isn’t funny (it has its moments of comedy gold), rather that it does not quite deliver anything that feels more epic than what we are used to on television. After seeing the film, I was left with a sense of incompleteness. Did this story really justify a feature length? It could have been done in twenty minutes as an episode of the show.


One thing that the movie gets right is returning the focus to the core Simpson family. Over the past several seasons, the series has expanded its scope to exploring the lives of the other denizens of Springfield. Back in the early 90s, the Simpsons was a touching slice-of-life drama in primetime, dealing with real-life issues, and was a family ensemble piece, which just happened to be animated. Over the years, the animation process may have improved significantly, but the scripts have degenerated into a weekly farce of Homer making an incompetent retarded fool of himself. Incidentally, I am old enough to remember the days when the show mainly situated the stories around Bart, not Homer (I was 8 in 1990 when the show first aired here in Australia. Bart was older than me, then. Now he’s 16 years younger than me, and still in the fourth grade!)


It is a terrible shame that we have to fondly recall the glory days in the past tense, when episodes like ‘Lisa’s First Word’, ‘Bart Gets An F’ and ‘Lisa The Vegetarian’ were the rule, not the exception. The movie does feel like a modern Simpsons episode, moreso than a classic one, unfortunately. I was hoping that the return of most of the original writing staff would assist matters, but alas, the movie abounds with scatological humour, Homer farce, and lowest common denominator jokes.

Most of the supporting cast hardly get a word in edgeways, though I found myself impressed with the cameo appearances from nearly every character in the show’s 400 episode lineage.

The guest spot from Tom Hanks was welcome, though I did expect a few more celebrity cameos in such an ‘event’ movie as this. The appearance by Green Day was amusing, especially their ‘Titanic’-esque continuing to play their violins as their barge sinks into the Springfield Lake. The Disney movie parody was great, and ‘Grand Theft Walrus’ was awesome! I do wonder why they chose to make the US President Arnold Schwartzenegger, though, when The Simpsons already has an apt Ahnuld facsimile in the form of one Rainier (McBain) Wolfcastle. Big Arnie even looked like McBain with a different haircut in this movie.

The villain should have been Sideshow Bob (played to malevolent brilliance on several occasions by the wonderful Kelsey ‘Frasier Crane’ Grammer). I hear Grammer recorded a cameo as Bob for the picture, but was omitted from the final cut. I think the evil EPA agent should have been Bob in the script all along, trying to settle the score one last time with Bart and with Springfield. Oh, and by the way, the Irish boy Colin sounds about as Irish as I do (I lived in the UK for over six years, and never heard a single Irish person speak like that). In fact, his character borders on a racial stereotype.

The movie wasn’t too bad, but it also pales into insignificance next to some of the series finest offerings. If this script aired as a standard episode, would you even bat an eyelid? Would it even be considered a standout episode?

The project, alas, in many ways reeks of ill-timing. As I said earlier, it should have entered production at least a decade ago, when the programme still seemed fresh, relevant, and at the zeitgeist of pop culture. A time when it could still surprise us. Nowadays, The Simpsons is well past its prime, and is regarded by many critics and fans as having worn out its welcome years ago. The show ceased being appointment viewing for me around the 10th season, and this is coming from an old-school fan who never missed an episode, and could quote entire sketches verbatim. I tend to forget it’s even on these days, and don’t too much mind when I do miss several new episodes. The movie is in some respects too little, too late. Would I like it more if I was 10 again? Possibly. But I do think the halcyon days of seasons 4 through to about 8, when the show could basically do no wrong are gone, never to return. Groening will probably continue to milk the cash cow for a few more seasons, wringing as many dollars as he can from fans. There’ll probably be a few movie sequels (judging from the remarkable financial success of this picture). And there’s still records to be broken. The Simpsons has become the longest running American cartoon of all time (surpassing Scooby Doo and The Flintstones in that regard), and the longest running US sitcom, live or animated, of all time. Groening will make more episodes until he beats Gunsmoke’s record of longest running American TV show, at least.

Me, I think the movie doesn’t do anything that new or exciting, and breaks no new ground. Still, it could have been much worse. Simpsons hasn’t had any execrable spinoffs, ala ‘Joanie Loves Chachi’ or ‘Joey’ yet. Thank goodness for small mercies. Though I should stop there. Groening and his net spies may be checking for ideas…

51
Vote


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
13 Posts
3 Posts
59 Posts dating from August 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Cathy Setzer's Blogs

45 Vote(s)
1 Comment(s)
5 Post(s)
7127 Vote(s)
51 Comment(s)
116 Post(s)
45 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
5 Post(s)
Moderated by Cathy Setzer
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]