Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Movie Famous - December 2007

Life on Mars season one overview

December 10th 2007 01:16


This 2005 sci-fi/police procedural from Britain first screened here in Australia on the ABC network (that common receptacle for all things English) some time ago. I neglected to watch it then; so I’ve been taking the opportunity presented to me by the Foxtel UKTV network to acquaint myself with the series. The show is about a police detective in the present day, named Sam Tyler, who is hit by a car and wakes up in Manchester, circa 1973. Is he in a coma, going mad, or has he actually travelled back 30 years in time?

The lead star is John Simm (who I was previously familiar with, thanks to his stint recently as the Master in Russell T. Davies’ revitalised Doctor Who series. Incidentally, the character Sam Tyler was apparently named for the Ninth and Tenth Doctor’s companion, Rose Tyler). The series is named Life on Mars for a couple of reasons: The police precinct in which Tyler finds himself in ‘73 is so totally removed from the one in his time period that he might as well be living on a different planet. And the song Life on Mars by glam rocker David Bowie is playing on his Ipod when he gets hit by the car.


I like a series which teases the audience with a fascinating science fiction premise. Life on Mars succeeds in that it reminds one of classic science fiction series like Quantum Leap; or 70s cult shows like Randall and Hopkirk: Deceased. People who grew up in the early 1970s will also find great nostalgia value in the show. The producers have done their homework. The period detail looks pretty authentic (if a person born in 1982, such as this reviewer, has any right to an opinion). One highlight is when Tyler meets the late T-Rex singer Marc Bolan in a nightclub and says ‘Be careful when driving in Minis’.

Unfortunately, I’m not as keen on cop shows as I am on sci fi, so the Bill-esque antics with Sam Tyler clashing with his superior officer DCI Gene Hunt left me somewhat cold. The show has an unfortunate tendency to focus too much on the cops n robbers plotlines, when they have a great sci fi premise which reeks of potential sitting right there next to them. Occasionally, the programme actually uses its premise. There is a great episode when Sam meets his mother in the past timeline. And he nearly meets his own four year old self on a number of occasions.


Time travel shows work best when they reflect upon the differences inherent between the two time periods. Or when they show how little things have changed between the two eras. Life on Mars slips in some delightful pop culture references, courtesy of our lead protagonist, which fall entirely on deaf ears. When Tyler says ‘May the Force be with you’, for example, he receives nothing but blank looks from his fellow officers. (Star Wars came out in 1977, four years in their future) Or when he is asked about his experience handling firearms, he responds with ‘You should see my Playstation scores!’ There is a little bit of culture-clash comedy in this series, but not quite enough for my liking.

The show does come armed with a brilliant early 70s soundtrack. All the who’s who (when it comes to classic rock and glam rock) of that era appear: The Who, Led Zeppelin, Slade, T Rex, David Bowie, Free, The Sweet, Cream, etc. Retro fans will be in heaven.

Ultimately, there were elements of this show I liked, and some I did not. I wonder if series two will up the ante when it comes to actually delivering upon its good premise. Eventually, shows have to start answering their mysteries, or the audience WILL get bored and move on. The season one finale was excellent, I’ll give it that. Finally, some answers.
92
Vote
   


Heroes season two round-up

December 6th 2007 04:09
Heroes season two roundup

Well, here we are, at the end of Season Two (here where I am, in Australia), and good lord, didn’t the end come fast? Only 9 episodes into the new season, and that dastardly Channel Seven pulls the show off air at the end of ratings period. It irks me to no end. Over in the US, it seems as though season two really will end after the first 11 episodes (thanks to the Writers Guild Strikes). That kinda sucks. In fact, that news sucks for just about all of our favourite US shows.

So far, Season Two of Heroes has sadly not been as stellar as its previous year. That said, the show is definitely still good, and still well worth watching. It seems that a load of today’s new programmes experience a second year slump. It’s like the writers think that ‘our show was critically acclaimed last year, so we already have a built in audience, no matter what’. That philosophy doesn’t quite work these days. Audiences now have a lot of options available to them (other shows, DVD movies, videogames, etc). And they possess very limited attention spans. Heroes, whilst still enjoyable, needs to start really delivering the goods. The story arc is moving along perhaps too slowly. There is a trick in television screenwriting called ‘the art of the stall’. How long can you keep the mysteries interesting before the audience starts getting bored, and demanding answers? LOST is notorious for this. It answers a few questions, then introduces about ten new ones. The same applied to the X Files, which was great in its first couple of seasons, but it meandered along for years and years, overstaying its welcome (even to the point where original star David Duchovny lost interest and moved on to other things) and never answering any mysteries. Eventually, it ended with a limp clip show which didn’t answer anything at all. (I fear the same fate may befall LOST)

Let’s talk about the good points of season two. Unlike many others (I’ve read some scathing opinions on various internet chat forums) I really enjoyed Hiro’s arc in ancient Japan. I am a sucker for time travel stories, always have been. I also liked the reveal of Kensei, still alive in the present day (how old is he now? 400 years old? Cool! I wonder if Claire is also similarly immortal, and will still be alive in 2407?)

I thought the pairing up of Matt ‘Telepathic Cop’ Parkman and Nathan ‘Superman’ Petrelli was a good idea (they make a good team), and I of course always enjoy the moral ambiguity of Horn Rimmed Glasses aka Mr Bennett (is he a good guy, is he a bad guy?). He’s by far one of the best characters. Bob is a cool character too, because his relationship with his daughter Elle is a mirror image of that between Noah and Claire Bennett. Bob represents the father who was more emotionally detached from his charge, and put the project first in his list of priorities. The episode ‘Four Months Ago’ was a highlight of the season, but I have one question: ‘Why wasn’t it the season premiere?’ We had to wait eight weeks before finding out why Peter and Nathan survived the bomb blast, and why he is suddenly in a cargo container in Cork, Ireland, with no memories.

The bad? Well, for starters, there’s the whole Peter in Ireland debacle. Amnesia is the biggest US soap opera cliché ever, and it’s disappointing to see it here. The first few episodes with Peter in Ireland really were just padding. They didn’t really move the story forward in any compelling way at all. The Claire in her new high school storyline was rather ‘meh’ too. The creepy stalker boyfriend doesn’t help, either. Maya and Alejandro (can we say tokenism?) are so irritating. KILL THEM NOW, SYLAR! They are referred to by online fans of Heroes as Nikki and Paulo (two characters infamously introduced in LOST’s third season, proving instantly unpopular with the audience, and were killed off as fast as they arrived!). As for Sylar himself, I’m a little disappointed he’s even in Season Two. Don’t get me wrong, he’s a great character, but he should have died there in that plaza at the end of Season One. Another show needs to adopt the Buffy ‘big bad’ approach, which worked so brilliantly in that show. New season, new enemies. Why bother bringing Sylar back at all if he’s just going to be neutered of his powers, and go on a roadtrip with those two terrible twins?

DL’s death scene in ep 2x08 bothered me. At the beginning of season two, he was already dead, and I accepted that. I assumed he died offscreen from Linderman’s gunshot wound. Why did they bring him back in ‘Four Months Later’ only to suffer a pointless ignoble death at the hands of some gun wielding thug in a nightclub? Stupid.

Despite the flaws, season two is still very entertaining. Hopefully, they’ll work out this writers strike sooner rather than later, and we’ll get a proper length season two instead of eleven episodes. I still have faith Heroes will deliver the goods. My suggestions:

Adam/Kensei- Awesome! More of him, please! Even though I like Sylar, they should have ditched him this year, and made Adam the big bad of season two from the beginning.

Noah: Fantastic. One of my favourite characters. I was so distressed when I thought Suresh killed him in episode 2x09 (despite that event being foretold by the painting by Isaac Mendez). More, please!

Hiro- Still cool, but he really needs to get back into the action. He has been too passive this season. For that matter, poor Ando! Hiro and Ando work better as a team. Stop separating them, writers!

Claire- Honey, please will you ditch that irritating fool, West. He ain’t worth it. He’s turning your character into a simpering, lovesick moron.

Maya and Alejandro- I can’t take it anymore. Sylar, will you please kill them? For me?

Elle- She needs some more depth, stat! This show already has two dizzy blondes (Claire and Nikki). I liked Kristen Bell in Veronica Mars, but Elle needs something beyond the ‘blonde’ stereotype to make her a more interesting character. I suspect she’s there to bring over some of the Veronica Mars fanboys and girls.

Dr Suresh- I like you, dude, but you need to stop acting like a moron. Why did you actually TELL Bob you’re a spy and that you are trying to destroy the Company from the inside? Are you trying to get yourself killed?


105
Vote
   


The Lord of the Rings- Retro Review

December 6th 2007 04:07
The Lord of The Rings film trilogy, directed by Peter Jackson- retro review

What more can be said about these groundbreaking, multi-million dollar movies which brought the 20th century’s most beloved fictional story to the screen, bagging tonnes of Oscars along the way (including the first ever Best Picture trophy ever awarded to a fantasy or science fiction film


[ Click here to read more ]
80
Vote
   


More Posts
9 Posts
20 Posts
7 Posts
93 Posts dating from August 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

D. Jones's Blogs

8221 Vote(s)
36 Comment(s)
90 Post(s)
5161 Vote(s)
19 Comment(s)
65 Post(s)
Moderated by D. Jones
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]