Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Movie Famous - December 2007

Life on Mars season one overview

December 10th 2007 01:16


This 2005 sci-fi/police procedural from Britain first screened here in Australia on the ABC network (that common receptacle for all things English) some time ago. I neglected to watch it then; so I’ve been taking the opportunity presented to me by the Foxtel UKTV network to acquaint myself with the series. The show is about a police detective in the present day, named Sam Tyler, who is hit by a car and wakes up in Manchester, circa 1973. Is he in a coma, going mad, or has he actually travelled back 30 years in time?

The lead star is John Simm (who I was previously familiar with, thanks to his stint recently as the Master in Russell T. Davies’ revitalised Doctor Who series. Incidentally, the character Sam Tyler was apparently named for the Ninth and Tenth Doctor’s companion, Rose Tyler). The series is named Life on Mars for a couple of reasons: The police precinct in which Tyler finds himself in ‘73 is so totally removed from the one in his time period that he might as well be living on a different planet. And the song Life on Mars by glam rocker David Bowie is playing on his Ipod when he gets hit by the car.


I like a series which teases the audience with a fascinating science fiction premise. Life on Mars succeeds in that it reminds one of classic science fiction series like Quantum Leap; or 70s cult shows like Randall and Hopkirk: Deceased. People who grew up in the early 1970s will also find great nostalgia value in the show. The producers have done their homework. The period detail looks pretty authentic (if a person born in 1982, such as this reviewer, has any right to an opinion). One highlight is when Tyler meets the late T-Rex singer Marc Bolan in a nightclub and says ‘Be careful when driving in Minis’.

Unfortunately, I’m not as keen on cop shows as I am on sci fi, so the Bill-esque antics with Sam Tyler clashing with his superior officer DCI Gene Hunt left me somewhat cold. The show has an unfortunate tendency to focus too much on the cops n robbers plotlines, when they have a great sci fi premise which reeks of potential sitting right there next to them. Occasionally, the programme actually uses its premise. There is a great episode when Sam meets his mother in the past timeline. And he nearly meets his own four year old self on a number of occasions.


Time travel shows work best when they reflect upon the differences inherent between the two time periods. Or when they show how little things have changed between the two eras. Life on Mars slips in some delightful pop culture references, courtesy of our lead protagonist, which fall entirely on deaf ears. When Tyler says ‘May the Force be with you’, for example, he receives nothing but blank looks from his fellow officers. (Star Wars came out in 1977, four years in their future) Or when he is asked about his experience handling firearms, he responds with ‘You should see my Playstation scores!’ There is a little bit of culture-clash comedy in this series, but not quite enough for my liking.

The show does come armed with a brilliant early 70s soundtrack. All the who’s who (when it comes to classic rock and glam rock) of that era appear: The Who, Led Zeppelin, Slade, T Rex, David Bowie, Free, The Sweet, Cream, etc. Retro fans will be in heaven.

Ultimately, there were elements of this show I liked, and some I did not. I wonder if series two will up the ante when it comes to actually delivering upon its good premise. Eventually, shows have to start answering their mysteries, or the audience WILL get bored and move on. The season one finale was excellent, I’ll give it that. Finally, some answers.
78
Vote
Shared on
   


Heroes season two round-up

December 6th 2007 04:09
Heroes season two roundup

Well, here we are, at the end of Season Two (here where I am, in Australia), and good lord, didn’t the end come fast? Only 9 episodes into the new season, and that dastardly Channel Seven pulls the show off air at the end of ratings period. It irks me to no end. Over in the US, it seems as though season two really will end after the first 11 episodes (thanks to the Writers Guild Strikes). That kinda sucks. In fact, that news sucks for just about all of our favourite US shows.

So far, Season Two of Heroes has sadly not been as stellar as its previous year. That said, the show is definitely still good, and still well worth watching. It seems that a load of today’s new programmes experience a second year slump. It’s like the writers think that ‘our show was critically acclaimed last year, so we already have a built in audience, no matter what’. That philosophy doesn’t quite work these days. Audiences now have a lot of options available to them (other shows, DVD movies, videogames, etc). And they possess very limited attention spans. Heroes, whilst still enjoyable, needs to start really delivering the goods. The story arc is moving along perhaps too slowly. There is a trick in television screenwriting called ‘the art of the stall’. How long can you keep the mysteries interesting before the audience starts getting bored, and demanding answers? LOST is notorious for this. It answers a few questions, then introduces about ten new ones. The same applied to the X Files, which was great in its first couple of seasons, but it meandered along for years and years, overstaying its welcome (even to the point where original star David Duchovny lost interest and moved on to other things) and never answering any mysteries. Eventually, it ended with a limp clip show which didn’t answer anything at all. (I fear the same fate may befall LOST)

Let’s talk about the good points of season two. Unlike many others (I’ve read some scathing opinions on various internet chat forums) I really enjoyed Hiro’s arc in ancient Japan. I am a sucker for time travel stories, always have been. I also liked the reveal of Kensei, still alive in the present day (how old is he now? 400 years old? Cool! I wonder if Claire is also similarly immortal, and will still be alive in 2407?)

I thought the pairing up of Matt ‘Telepathic Cop’ Parkman and Nathan ‘Superman’ Petrelli was a good idea (they make a good team), and I of course always enjoy the moral ambiguity of Horn Rimmed Glasses aka Mr Bennett (is he a good guy, is he a bad guy?). He’s by far one of the best characters. Bob is a cool character too, because his relationship with his daughter Elle is a mirror image of that between Noah and Claire Bennett. Bob represents the father who was more emotionally detached from his charge, and put the project first in his list of priorities. The episode ‘Four Months Ago’ was a highlight of the season, but I have one question: ‘Why wasn’t it the season premiere?’ We had to wait eight weeks before finding out why Peter and Nathan survived the bomb blast, and why he is suddenly in a cargo container in Cork, Ireland, with no memories.

The bad? Well, for starters, there’s the whole Peter in Ireland debacle. Amnesia is the biggest US soap opera cliché ever, and it’s disappointing to see it here. The first few episodes with Peter in Ireland really were just padding. They didn’t really move the story forward in any compelling way at all. The Claire in her new high school storyline was rather ‘meh’ too. The creepy stalker boyfriend doesn’t help, either. Maya and Alejandro (can we say tokenism?) are so irritating. KILL THEM NOW, SYLAR! They are referred to by online fans of Heroes as Nikki and Paulo (two characters infamously introduced in LOST’s third season, proving instantly unpopular with the audience, and were killed off as fast as they arrived!). As for Sylar himself, I’m a little disappointed he’s even in Season Two. Don’t get me wrong, he’s a great character, but he should have died there in that plaza at the end of Season One. Another show needs to adopt the Buffy ‘big bad’ approach, which worked so brilliantly in that show. New season, new enemies. Why bother bringing Sylar back at all if he’s just going to be neutered of his powers, and go on a roadtrip with those two terrible twins?

DL’s death scene in ep 2x08 bothered me. At the beginning of season two, he was already dead, and I accepted that. I assumed he died offscreen from Linderman’s gunshot wound. Why did they bring him back in ‘Four Months Later’ only to suffer a pointless ignoble death at the hands of some gun wielding thug in a nightclub? Stupid.

Despite the flaws, season two is still very entertaining. Hopefully, they’ll work out this writers strike sooner rather than later, and we’ll get a proper length season two instead of eleven episodes. I still have faith Heroes will deliver the goods. My suggestions:

Adam/Kensei- Awesome! More of him, please! Even though I like Sylar, they should have ditched him this year, and made Adam the big bad of season two from the beginning.

Noah: Fantastic. One of my favourite characters. I was so distressed when I thought Suresh killed him in episode 2x09 (despite that event being foretold by the painting by Isaac Mendez). More, please!

Hiro- Still cool, but he really needs to get back into the action. He has been too passive this season. For that matter, poor Ando! Hiro and Ando work better as a team. Stop separating them, writers!

Claire- Honey, please will you ditch that irritating fool, West. He ain’t worth it. He’s turning your character into a simpering, lovesick moron.

Maya and Alejandro- I can’t take it anymore. Sylar, will you please kill them? For me?

Elle- She needs some more depth, stat! This show already has two dizzy blondes (Claire and Nikki). I liked Kristen Bell in Veronica Mars, but Elle needs something beyond the ‘blonde’ stereotype to make her a more interesting character. I suspect she’s there to bring over some of the Veronica Mars fanboys and girls.

Dr Suresh- I like you, dude, but you need to stop acting like a moron. Why did you actually TELL Bob you’re a spy and that you are trying to destroy the Company from the inside? Are you trying to get yourself killed?


91
Vote
Shared on
   


The Lord of the Rings- Retro Review

December 6th 2007 04:07
The Lord of The Rings film trilogy, directed by Peter Jackson- retro review

What more can be said about these groundbreaking, multi-million dollar movies which brought the 20th century’s most beloved fictional story to the screen, bagging tonnes of Oscars along the way (including the first ever Best Picture trophy ever awarded to a fantasy or science fiction film)?

I recently rewatched the entire trilogy on DVD, after not seeing Return Of the King since the cinema four years ago. I have to say, several years on, the movies still stand tall as momentous cinematic achievements. The cinematography is truly breathtaking, the performances from the superb ensemble cast are exquisite, and the visual effects are marvellous. There is so much detail packed into these movies. You can tell how much effort was put into every aspect of the production. The sets, to the costumes, to the armour, is expertly handcrafted, and really makes you feel like you could just step inside Middle Earth as if it was as simple as popping out to the corner shop.

Andy Serkis as Gollum, is a brilliant, milestone performance. Even though Gollum is a CGI character, Serkis was present on the set wearing state of the art motion capture equipment. He did far more than merely supply the voice for this character. Gollum is incredible, and is the first ever truly convincing CG character (Jar Jar Binks in 1999’s Star Wars: Episode One The Phantom Menace, was achieved using a similar technology, using an actor’s movements to digitise a later CGI creation, but the results were far less successful, and infamous!), in my view. He should have been nominated for a best supporting actor Oscar. As it stands, Ian McKellan was the only performer nominated for such an award, in recognition of his near-perfect portrayal of Gandalf the Grey/White. He is precisely the way I imagined him in the books, and he damn well deserved to win that award. I can’t even remember who did actually win that year. Isn’t it funny how the Academy is so out of touch that they award people for things that are forgotten years later, yet the truly famous performances are ignored? (Alec Guinness, similarly, lost out at the 1977 Academy Awards for his immortal role as Obi Wan Kenobi in Star Wars IV: A New Hope)

Lord of the Rings translated very well from Oxford professor (and Old English scholar) J.R.R Tolkien’s legendary novels to the silver screen, despite people’s protestations that such a text would prove impossible to adapt for the celluloid medium. Certain...omissions were necessary, of course, for the sake of expediency. Seriously, if every little nook and cranny of Tolkien’s dense descriptive writing, and every extended passage of Beowulf-inspired Old English poetry survived into Jackson’s film, we would have been sitting there for far longer than three hours. It would have consisted of a twelve hour odyssey!

The filmmakers did a remarkable job, considering the weight of expectation upon their shoulders. For over fifty years now, these books have been cherished by all manner of people across the globe, inspiring arguably every fantasy author who put pen to paper since (such as Terry Pratchett, Robert Jordan, and David Eddings); musicians (70s progressive rock groups Rush, Yes, and Led Zeppelin are besotted by the work of Tolkien. Zep have at least four songs which explicitly make reference to Mordor, Gollum, Sauron, the Misty Mountains, and the Nazgul. Yes’s keyboardist Rick Wakeman released a solo record comprising material based on Frodo’s adventures; and there are European death metal bands called Cirith Ungol and Barad Dur, I think); and even videogame developers (Blizzard’s World of Warcraft franchise is just LOTR wearing different trousers, essentially). You could say that the phenomenal financial success of this movie trilogy paved the way for the reams of historical epics and fantasy films gracing our cinema screens now. We might never have seen the likes of the recent Chronicles of Narnia film adaptation if it were not for the critical and commercial triumph of LOTR. (Incidentally, C.S Lewis and Tolkien were acquaintances, as both writers lived in Oxford at a contemporaneous time period)

Not all fans of the book will be smitten by Jackson’s blandishments. The movies take more of a guided tour approach to the books, rather than following every word verbatim. They assume that audiences are already familiar with the events of the text, and simply get on with the story, devoting as little time to revealing background info or plot exposition as possible. As a result of this, some newcomers might be daunted at the sheer vastness of the Middle Earth universe. Conversely, Tolkien diehards might be dissatisfied with Jackson’s liberties taken with the story (the elves were not present at the Battle of the Hornburg at all; it was in fact Glorfindel, not Arwen Evenstar who rescued Frodo Baggins at the Ford; Tom Bombadil is absent altogether from the screenplay, and the entire Scouring of the Shire coda is controversially scrapped). Jackson has tried hard to make these films accessible to both the casual audience and Tolkien fanatics. And he largely succeeded in winning over both camps. I do not know if Tolkien himself would be impressed with the adaptation if he were with us today. He did not seem keen on the earlier animated version of the 1970s. His son, Chris Tolkien (who recently posthumously published some of his late father’s manuscripts as The Children Of Hurin) went on record as saying he ‘didn’t mind them at all’.

The movies are a labour of love. The entire cast and crew spent two years living in Wellington, New Zealand, and one really must congratulate everyone involved for their dedication to, and passion for, this epic undertaking. The cast are uniformly excellent. Jackson was wise in picking faces which were very recognisable amongst cult circles, but at the same time, none of them ‘big’ enough to override the film and cause it to be marketed as a star vehicle. Some of the talent he found were newcomers, whose star has risen since the release of LOTR (like Orlando Bloom, discovered just as he was finishing up drama school).

It’s a hell of a great cast: Ian McKellan (the renowned Shakespearian thespian, who recently brought an RSC season of both the Bard’s King Lear and Anton Chekhov’s The Seagull to Melbourne, Australia; who here lends immense gravitas and prestige to every line of dialogue he utters), Sean Bean (a fan favourite, as he always plays memorable villains, like Alec Trevalyn in 007’s Goldeneye, an Irish terrorist in Patriot Games, and he is also well known as Sharpe in the miniseries of that name), John Rhys Davies (best known as Sallah in Raiders of the Lost Ark), Hugo Weaving (Bangkok Hilton, Priscilla Queen of the Desert, and most famously, The Matrix), movie legend Christopher Lee (famous as Dracula in the Hammer horror series of the 1950s, and later famous as Roger Moore’s Bond nemesis, the contract assassin, Scaramanga, the titular ‘Man with the Golden Gun’), Aussie actor David Wenham (Seachange, 300, Van Helsing), Oscar winner Cate Blanchett (Elizabeth, The Aviator, Notes on a Scandal), the list goes on and on. It’s one of the finest ensemble casts ever assembled. And all are on fine form.

It’s pretty hard to find fault with these movies, actually. They are the definitive movie trilogy, and perhaps the most complete fantasy or SF trilogy since the original Star Wars saga; encapsulating far more emotional scope than just boys own adventure. It includes themes of obsession, love, hate, beauty, despair, genocide, corruption, the list continues ad infinitum. Any future epic movie productions have to step up to the challenge presented by these ones. It’s going to be quite hard to top them. The films work on several levels. I really love movies like that. Ones which have the potential to speak to different people, to attract different people for different reasons. There is beauty, as well as destruction. The natural vistas of New Zealand are absolutely stunning to look at. The films are somewhat of a tourist advertisement for New Zealand. The elven characters, and their cities, supply yet more beauty. The sets of Rivendell and Lothlorien are gorgeous. And the elves are a very fair, very beautiful race of people. All of the actors who play elves are presented in a very shiny, natural kind of light, and look like they wouldn’t get muddy if you dunked them headfirst in a vat of sludge.

I haven’t even mentioned the soundtrack yet. Howard Shore’s audio compliment to the visual imagery is the perfect marriage of sound and vision. The score is heartbreaking yet uplifting. I am firmly of the belief that sound and music are of integral importance to film making. Can you imagine the Imperial Star Destroyer majestically swooping over Tatooine at the beginning of Star Wars without John Williams’ inimitable pulse-raising musical accompaniment? Can you imagine Janet Leigh driving down that dark highway, noticing the ominous neon sign outside the Bates Motel without being accompanied by Bernard Herrmann’s chilling violin overture? Howard Shore stated that his objective was to deliver a body of music that truly did justice to the poetry of Tolkien’s words, to be as beautiful as the source material was. And, blimey, hasn’t he half done that? He assembled a choir of singers who chanted in ancient Sindarin, for god’s sake (the language of the Elf folk). The score is, needless to say, flawless. Shore worked in league with divas Enya, Emiliana Torrini, and former Eurythmics chanteuse Annie Lennox to deliver the end credits theme songs for Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers, and Return of the King respectively. I couldn’t have asked for a better soundtrack.

The movies are a milestone in not only genre filmmaking, but the motion picture industry as a whole. They have to be respected for what they’ve done. The Academy Awards are more often than not, staid, predictable, and out of touch with the audience’s wishes. But even they recognised the achievements of Jackson and his team. Return of the King is currently tied for the world record for the most awards won by a movie (11 Oscars, putting it in the same league as Ben Hur and Titanic). It was a clean sweep. ROTK won in every single category for which it was nominated at the 2004 ceremony. I remember that I was thrilled at the time, that the Academy finally considered a genre picture worthy of the highest Best Picture accolade (after snubbing them for years. Star Wars was beaten by Annie Hall in 77 for the Best Picture gong, and Raiders of the Lost Ark was rudely cast aside in favour of Chariots of Fire at the 82 Oscars). LOTR really raised the bar for movie makers, not only in its own genre, but across all genres. The movies will be much imitated but never beaten for years to come.
67
Vote
Shared on
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
2 Posts
41 Posts dating from August 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
Moderated by AdamW
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]